<
Kent Johnson
C · CBJ · SH% Regression Candidate
Metric Comparison
| Metric | Career Norm | 2025-26 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting % | 19.5% | 6.1% | ▼ 13.4% |
| Shots/GP | 1.8 | 1.5 | ▼ 17% |
| PtPG | 0.84 | 0.29 | ▼ 0.55 |
| Goals | ~20 pace | 7 | ▼ 13 |
Shooting %
Goals
Shots on Goal
Season History
| SEASON | GP | G | A | PTS | PPP | SOG | Hits | BLK | Sh% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22-23 | 79 | 16 | 24 | 40 | 12 | 126 | 15 | 30 | 12.7% |
| 23-24 | 42 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 0 | 62 | 10 | 16 | 9.7% |
| 24-25 | 68 | 24 | 33 | 57 | 15 | 123 | 3 | 29 | 19.5% |
| 25-26 | 76 | 7 | 15 | 22 | 2 | 114 | 15 | 38 | 6.1% |
Career high
Career low
■ 2025-26
Key Takeaway
The single biggest SH% gap in the NHL. A career 19.5% shooter dropped to 6.1%. That's not regression — that's a statistical impossibility sustained over a full season. At 24, on an ascending Columbus team with Fantilli, he's the #1 bounceback candidate period. 7 goals on 114 shots — at his career rate that's 22 goals. You're drafting a 20+ goal scorer at waiver-wire cost.